A chronicle of ever increasing circles of thought.


People can be oversensitive, sure, and I think a lot of social justice/outrage on the internet is completely overblown and mostly the product of very young people forming an identity around being offended or being offended on behalf of other people. Self-righteousness of this kind is a lazy kind of behavior done in the place of being legitimately socially conscious. Reblogging or retweeting something someone said and repeatedly calling them a bigot is not the same thing as actually raising public awareness about an issue or (ideally) working to solve it.

On the other hand, that doesn’t in any way mean there isn’t a massive amount of horrible, hurtful things being said by people everywhere, and that there isn’t a huge amount of the public mindset that has some screwed up ideas of how to treat people. Every thoughtful human being has a moral obligation to combat bigotry and all forms of intolerance, but the way you combat bigotry is extremely important. Doing it incorrectly or for the wrong reasons can make matters worse.

How do you strike the balance? Here’s my rule of thumb: Before saying something, ask yourself: am I doing this to realistically change the mind of this person or others’, or am I doing this to show how much more progressive I am? Nothing’s more venomous than attacking someone simply to assert your place in a subculture, even if it’s a subculture of activism. It’s important to always think pragmatically: if what you’re about to say/type/do seems like it’s more about making your feel better, you should rethink how you’re doing it. Lashing out or even mildly nitpicking can potentially hurt what you’re actually trying to accomplish.

The purpose of calling out hurtful language, etc is to ultimately change human behavior for the better. Anything you do without that goal in mind has the potential to be toxic. Don’t release more hate into the world, it’s the opposite of what you set out to do.

  1. cishetchihiro reblogged this from dresdencodak
  2. contentmint reblogged this from angerliz
  3. triple---hyphen reblogged this from dresdencodak
  4. opium-girl reblogged this from greenteagan
  5. attackofthewalkinghazard reblogged this from edennova
  6. lame-cyborg reblogged this from edennova
  7. greenteagan reblogged this from edennova
  8. edennova reblogged this from burlybard and added:
    (extended discussion of an earlier reblog; bolding mine in burlybard’s response)
  9. burlybard reblogged this from edennova and added:
    The bolded italics are mine, because that’s a pretty crucial point and also the one direct answer to the original...
  10. artamongotherthings reblogged this from emberjams
  11. kelcid reblogged this from edennova
  12. hojas-depalmeras reblogged this from emberjams
  13. emberjams reblogged this from dresdencodak
  14. profanityandprophecy reblogged this from c4bl3fl4m3
  15. noooooooope reblogged this from kiwise
  16. kiwise reblogged this from dresdencodak
  17. princessmelina reblogged this from jedimasterkatara
  18. jedimasterkatara reblogged this from blackhorseandthecherrytree
  19. blackhorseandthecherrytree reblogged this from dresdencodak
  20. littlebbredbird reblogged this from kiotsukatanna
  21. littlehispanicspiders reblogged this from kiotsukatanna
  22. kiotsukatanna reblogged this from beeftony
  23. beeftony reblogged this from ryface-disused
  24. ryface-disused reblogged this from dresdencodak
  25. dlivr8r reblogged this from dresdencodak and added:
    Reblogging this and calling Aaron Diaz a genius is also not the same thing as actually raising public awareness about an...